What does INA § 287(b) allow an officer to do concerning evidence?

INA § 287(b) empowers an immigration officer to administer oaths and take relevant evidence in the course of their duties. This means that when conducting investigations or interviews, the officer has the authority to formally request statements or testimonials under oath, which is crucial for verifying the accuracy and reliability of the information gathered.

This provision allows the officer to evaluate a broader spectrum of evidence that is pertinent to immigration matters, ensuring that the process is thorough and legally grounded. The ability to consider relevant evidence, especially when given under oath, enhances the credibility of the evidence and assists in decision-making regarding immigration cases.

The other choices do not accurately represent the authority given to officers under this section. For instance, rejecting unsolicited evidence or limiting consideration solely to documentary evidence would restrict the officer’s ability to gather and utilize important information that may not be documented but is still relevant. Conducting evidence collection without an oath undermines the integrity of the process, as evidence collected without an oath lacks the formal acknowledgment of truthfulness that INA § 287(b) seeks to ensure. Thus, the best interpretation of INA § 287(b) is reflected in the ability to administer oaths and consider all relevant evidence.